
AI systems now threaten to decide whether American seniors get life-saving care, raising alarms about bureaucrats and algorithms controlling your health under Medicare.
Story Snapshot
- Private insurers have rapidly expanded use of artificial intelligence to approve or deny care, often with minimal human oversight.
- The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is preparing to let similar AI-driven systems make decisions for Medicare, impacting millions of seniors.
- Doctors and patient advocates warn that AI-driven denials have soared, leading to patient harm, delays, and systematic errors.
- Legal battles, regulatory scrutiny, and calls for transparency are intensifying as public programs adopt these controversial technologies.
AI Denials: When Algorithms Decide Your Care
Private health insurers across the United States are now relying on artificial intelligence (AI) to automate the critical process of prior authorization—deciding if patients get needed treatments or medications. Instead of experienced medical professionals reviewing cases, algorithms can now approve or deny care within seconds. Reports reveal that these AI-driven systems have led to a spike in denials, sometimes at rates sixteen times higher than traditional methods. The troubling reality: in many cases, there’s only minimal human oversight, leaving patients and their doctors to battle faceless computer programs for access to care.
This shift has immediate, real-world consequences. Surveys from leading medical associations show that a majority of doctors are seeing more denials due to AI, with 94% stating that the prior authorization process harms patient outcomes. The rise of these automated systems means that families—especially those dealing with chronic or complex illnesses—face new hurdles. Delays and outright denials can result in worsening health, increased hospitalizations, and higher out-of-pocket costs. The foundation of patient-centered care is under threat as algorithms, not clinicians, increasingly dictate who receives treatment.
Medicare’s Next Move: Expanding AI in Public Health Programs
The federal government, through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), is now preparing to let these controversial AI-driven processes take hold in Medicare, starting with Medicare Advantage plans. The new CMS rule, finalized in 2024, encourages technological innovation but insists insurers remain responsible for the consequences—even when decisions are made by machines. As this approach expands, millions of American seniors could soon have their care determined not by their doctors, but by automated systems designed to cut costs and streamline operations. The debate is heating up, with regulators, lawmakers, and advocacy groups demanding stronger oversight, transparency, and safeguards to prevent systemic errors, bias, and erosion of trust.
Legal challenges and state-level legislative efforts are ramping up in response to reports of harm. Physician groups argue that opaque AI tools undermine clinical judgment, strip families of their right to appeal, and threaten the basic principles of individualized medicine. The risk is greatest for vulnerable patients—those with the most complex needs, or who lack the resources to fight insurance denials. As government-run health programs adopt these practices, the stakes for American families and seniors are higher than ever.
Physician and Patient Concerns: Who Really Benefits?
Physicians and medical associations have been outspoken in their criticism. The American Medical Association’s president has warned that AI-driven prior authorization creates systematic barriers, often blocking timely access to essential treatment. Doctors report growing administrative burdens and frustration as they are forced to challenge automated denials, wasting valuable time that should be spent with patients. Meanwhile, patient advocates highlight the fundamental problem: AI algorithms, often designed behind closed doors and shielded from public scrutiny, can perpetuate bias and errors without accountability.
While insurers and technology vendors tout the potential for cost savings and efficiency, the human cost cannot be ignored. There is a real danger that government adoption of these systems will further erode trust in public health programs and shift power away from families and clinicians. Policymakers face a crucial choice: allow AI to quietly take control of life-and-death decisions, or put strong guardrails in place to protect the rights and well-being of American citizens.
Private health insurers use AI to approve or deny care. Soon Medicare will too. – NBC News https://t.co/1AjbHIyHFC
— Kay 🟧 (@gregkay1927) September 24, 2025
As the debate intensifies, one fact is clear: Americans deserve transparency, oversight, and a healthcare system that puts people—not algorithms—first. The rapid march of unregulated AI in our most vital institutions is yet another example of government overreach and the undermining of core values like personal liberty, family security, and the right to make choices about our own health.
Sources:
American Medical Association: How AI is leading to more prior authorization denials
American Medical Association: Physicians concerned AI increases prior authorization denials
Journalist’s Resource: AI in the health insurance industry—explainer and research roundup
PMC: AI in Health Insurance: Policy and Practice








