(VitalNews.org) – The Nebraska Supreme Court has paved the way to sway crucial elections by ordering the secretary of state to allow convicted felons to vote immediately after completing their sentences.
This decision rejected the state attorney general’s argument that lawmakers had overreached by extending voting rights to those with criminal records.
The ruling could add hundreds of new voters to the rolls, potentially tipping the balance in the November 5 election.
With Nebraska’s unique method of splitting Electoral College votes by congressional district, this influx of ex-felon voters could significantly impact presidential and congressional races.
Many of these newly enfranchised voters reside in Nebraska’s Omaha-centered 2nd Congressional District.
This key battleground area has previously awarded its electoral vote to Democrat candidates Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
This development raises concerns about the potential for these voters to disproportionately support left-leaning candidates and policies.
This decision is part of a troubling national trend to loosen voting restrictions for individuals with criminal records.
In 2005, Nebraska abolished a lifetime voting ban for felons but wisely required a two-year waiting period after serving their sentence.
That important safeguard has now been removed, giving immediate voting rights to those who have broken laws.
Recognizing the controversial nature of this change, Governor Jim Pillen allowed the bill to become law without signing it.
Meanwhile, Attorney General Mike Hilgers and Secretary of State Bob Evnen, both Republicans, rightfully expressed skepticism about the measure.
Notoriously leftwing organization ACLU has been at the forefront of this push to restore voting rights for felons.
Along with other liberal groups, ACLU has invested heavily in the Omaha district to secure its electoral vote, further demonstrating the political motivations behind this movement.
Copyright 2024, VitalNews.org